HKMB Hong Kong Means Business

Hong Kong Means Business Hong Kong Means Business
  • Login / Register

Languages

  • EN
  • 繁
  • 简
  • Events
  • My Feed
  • Contact HKTDC
  • Subscribe
  • Subscribe

Section Menu

  • multimedia
  • market spotlight
  • first person
  • Venture Hong Kong
  • heads-up
  • inside china
  • life & style
  • hktdc research

Languages

  • EN
  • 繁
  • 简
  • HKTDC.com |
  • About HKTDC |
  • My HKTDC |
  • Login / Register |

HKTDC.com About HKTDC My HKTDC

Login Register

Hong Kong Means Business

Section Menu

  • multimedia
  • market spotlight
  • first person
  • Venture Hong Kong
  • heads-up
  • inside china
  • life & style
  • hktdc research

https://hkmb.hktdc.com/en/NzgyODc2NTAx

hktdc research
SAVE FOR LATER
SHARE / SEND

"Scan QR Code" in WeChat and tap "..." to share.

Report Claims US$10 Billion Loss from Efforts to Evade Mainland China Tariffs

25 June 2021



The U.S. lost an estimated US$10 billion in tariff revenue in 2020 from efforts to evade U.S. tariffs, according to new research from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The findings could prompt lawmakers or others to pressure CBP to further ramp up its efforts to enforce tariff collections. 

According to a blog post from the bank, researchers came to this conclusion after looking at the long-standing discrepancy in U.S. and mainland Chinese statistics on two-way trade. During the decade prior to 2018, the U.S. reported a trade deficit with mainland China that was on average US$95 billion larger than the deficit implied by mainland China’s data. However, this statistical gap narrowed significantly after the U.S. imposed Section 301 tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of imports from mainland China starting in 2018, and even reversed in 2020, largely because for the first time ever mainland China’s reported exports to the U.S. had become larger than U.S.-reported imports from the mainland. 

The researchers noted that there could be a number of reasons for this shift, including routing trade through third countries to avoid the “made in China” label, misreporting by firms engaging in arms’-length trade, or mainland Chinese firms trying to circumvent mainland Chinese capital controls by inflating export figures. 

However, they said misreporting trade to avoid taxes “would appear to be highly relevant” as a primary explanation. For example, with tariff hikes increasing average U.S. tariffs on imports from mainland China from three percent in mid-2018 to 17.5 percent in September 2020, “it seems clear that U.S. importers faced incentives to minimize tariff tax liabilities by finding ways to underreport import values from China, perhaps utilizing low-ball invoices provided by their Chinese suppliers.” The researchers estimated that 17 percent of the decrease in the trade data gap (US$55 billion) is due to efforts to evade U.S. tariffs. 

In addition, mainland Chinese firms that sell both domestically and externally “have long been known to engage in illicit tax minimization by underreporting exports” to gather rebates of value-added taxes. When mainland China engaged in “four sweeping waves of increases in rebate rates (reductions in export taxes)” in response to the U.S. tariffs, the result “was to incentivize increases in reported export values from China, both through less under-invoicing and through outright over-invoicing.” The researchers estimated that 13 percent of the trade data gap (US$12 billion) was due to changes in mainland China’s VAT rebate rates. 

The researchers reached two conclusions from their review. One is that the Sino-U.S. trade war “had a much smaller impact on the U.S. bilateral trade balance with China than first meets the eye when looking at U.S. data.” The second is that an estimated US$10 billion of tariff revenue may have been lost to import underreporting in 2020, or about a third of the increased tariff revenues the U.S. saw that year.

BACK TO TOP ^
    Topics:
  • North America,
  • Mainland China,
  • USA,
  • Sino-US Trade,
  • trade dispute,
  • Section 301,
  • customs & tariffs & duties
  • North America
  • Mainland China
  • USA
Home

Article Topics

ARTICLE TOPICS

NORTH AMERICA36097
MAINLAND CHINA35607
USA36116
SINO-US TRADE132142
TRADE DISPUTE76304

ARTICLE TOPICS

NORTH AMERICA36097
MAINLAND CHINA35607
USA36116
SINO-US TRADE132142
TRADE DISPUTE76304
SECTION 301130769
CUSTOMS & TARIFFS & DUTIES74631

interest_article

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

26 July 2022

Trade Provisions Cut from Mainland China Bill, Could See Action Later this Year

30 May 2022

Biden Eyes Changes to Mainland China Tariffs but Senators Say They Should Stay

28 March 2022

Hundreds of Section 301 Tariff Exclusions Reinstated Through 31 December

11 March 2022

Review of Section 301 Tariffs on List 1 Goods Could Be Initiated Soon

Related Events

RELATED EVENTS

2 - 4 September 2022

Chic HK, Shenzhen

7 - 10 December 2022

Marintec China 2022 – HK Pavilion

7 - 9 December 2022

SIAL Shanghai 2022

14 - 16 December 2022

22nd Shanghai International Children Baby Maternity Industry Expo (CBME)
FIND AN EVENT

Social Share

FOLLOW US

GET WEEKLY UPDATES

newpaper-img

GET OUR WEEKLY EMAIL UPDATES

banner-img


I acknowledge that the above information may be used by the Hong Kong Trade Development Council (HKTDC) for incorporation in all or any of its database for direct marketing or business matching purpose (and may therefore become available to the public within and/or outside of Hong Kong for use by them), and for any other purposes as stated in the Privacy Policy Statement; I confirm that I have the consent and the authority of each individual named in this form to release their personal data for the purposes stated herein.


*For non-EU/EEA customers, please skip this box which is solely for EU/EEA customers as required by the relevant data protection law in the EU.

THANK YOU

Thank you for registering.

SHARE THIS STORY

EMAIL
LINKEDIN
WeChat
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
WHATSAPP

ID: HKTDCofficial

Don't have an account?

Create An Account

successfully added on your preferences.