HKTDC Hong Kong Means Business

Hong Kong Means Business Hong Kong Means Business
  • Login / Register

Languages

  • EN
  • 繁
  • 简
SUBSCRIBE
  • EVENTS
  • MY FEED
  • CONTACT HKTDC
  • ABOUT HKTDC
  • hktdc.com

Section Menu

  • multimedia
  • market spotlight
  • first person
  • Venture Hong Kong
  • heads-up
  • inside china
  • life & style
  • hktdc research
  • Login / Register

Languages

  • EN
  • 繁
  • 简
SUBSCRIBE
Hong Kong Means Business

Section Menu

  • multimedia
  • market spotlight
  • first person
  • Venture Hong Kong
  • heads-up
  • inside china
  • life & style
  • hktdc research

https://hkmb.hktdc.com/en/Njc2NjAzNzg5

hktdc research
SAVE FOR LATER
SHARE / SEND

"Scan QR Code" in WeChat and tap "..." to share.

Bill to Prevent Imports Made with Forced Labour in XUAR Re-introduced

22 February 2021



Rep. Jim McGovern (Democrat-Massachusetts) re-introduced on 18 February bi-partisan legislation that would prohibit the importation of goods made with forced labour in mainland China’s Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR). Specifically, the legislation would create a rebuttable presumption that any goods made in the XUAR are made with forced labour and would prohibit those goods from entering the United States unless “clear and convincing” evidence is shown to the contrary.

McGovern’s legislation differs in many important respects from legislation re-introduced in the Senate on 27 January by Sens. Marco Rubio (Republican-Florida) and Jeff Merkley (Democrat-Oregon), with key differences between the two bills outlined below. By all indications, the Senate version is more amenable than the House version to various concerns raised by U.S. importers.

Rebuttable Presumption. Both bills include a rebuttable presumption that any goods made wholly or in part in the XUAR are made with forced labour. The House version provides a single exception to the prohibition, namely that U.S. Customs and Border Protection determine by clear and convincing evidence that any specific goods, wares, articles or merchandise were not produced wholly or in part by convict labour, forced labour or indentured labour, requiring the importer to submit a report with such evidence that would be available to the public. The Senate version has a broader provision in this specific area, instructing CBP to exempt goods where:

  1. the importer of record has fully complied with the relevant guidance provided by CBP as well as any regulation issued to implement that guidance, and has completely and substantively responded to all inquiries for information submitted by CBP to ascertain whether the goods were manufactured through forced labour;
  1. the goods were not produced wholly or in part by forced labour; or
  1. the president certifies that the mainland Chinese government is not impeding in any way attempts to investigate abuses of Uyghurs, Kazakhs, Kyrgyz or members of other persecuted groups or to address any other instances of forced labour in mainland China.

Implementation Strategy. The Senate bill has a more developed and importer-friendly strategy for enforcement. It would require a report within 270 days from enactment setting forth a strategy for preventing the importation into the United States of goods made with forced labour in the XUAR, with this process specifically requiring public input and a public hearing. Among other things, the strategy would instruct CBP to issue guidance to importers on best practices or effective due diligence measures to ensure that goods made with forced labour in the XUAR are not imported, including the type, nature and extent of evidence that demonstrates that imported goods detained or seized pursuant to Section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930 were not made with forced labour. Additionally, CBP would have to describe how it plans to enhance its use of legal authorities and other tools to ensure that no goods are entered at any U.S. ports in violation of Section 307, including through the initiation of pilot programmes to test the viability of technologies to assist in the examination of such goods. The strategy would also require recommendations for efforts, initiatives, and tools and technologies to be adopted to ensure that CBP can accurately identify and trace goods made in the XUAR.

Collaboration with Private Sector. The Senate bill includes a provision that would require, as part of a separate U.S. strategy to promote initiatives to enhance international awareness of and to address forced labour in the XUAR, a plan for working with private sector entities seeking to conduct supply chain due diligence to prevent the importation of goods made with forced labour into the United States. Provisions seeking to foster collaboration with the private sector are more vague in the House version.

SEC Disclosures. The House version would mandate any entity required to file an annual or quarterly report with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to disclose whether it, or any of its affiliates, knowingly engaged in an activity with an entity or the affiliate of an entity: (i) engaged in creating or providing technology or other assistance to create mass population surveillance systems in the XUAR; (ii) building and running detention facilities for Uyghurs, Kazakhs, Kyrgyz and other members of Muslim minority groups in the XUAR; (iii) engaged in the “pairing-assistance” programme that subsidises the establishment of manufacturing facilities in the XUAR; or (iv) subject to a withhold release order. Also required in the disclosure is whether the entity or an affiliate thereof knowingly conducted any transaction or had dealings with any person sanctioned by the U.S. State Department for the detention or abuse of Uyghurs, Kazakhs, Kyrgyz or other members of Muslim minority groups in the XUAR; any person sanctioned pursuant to the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act; or any person or entity responsible for or complicit in committing atrocities in the XUAR. The Senate version does not have any SEC disclosure requirements.

High-Priority Sectors. The House bill specifically mentions cotton, tomatoes and polysilicon as high-priority sectors for enforcement, while the Senate bill makes no such mention.

Effective Date. The House version would enter into force 120 days after enactment, while the Senate legislation would be effective 300 days after enactment.

BACK TO TOP ^
    Topics:
  • North America,
  • Mainland China,
  • USA,
  • trade dispute,
  • global supply chain,
  • policies & regulations
  • North America
  • Mainland China
  • USA
  • North America
  • Mainland China
  • USA
  • North America
  • Mainland China
  • USA
  • North America
  • Mainland China
  • USA
Home

Article Topics

ARTICLE TOPICS

NORTH AMERICA36097
MAINLAND CHINA35607
USA36116
TRADE DISPUTE76304
GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN92935

ARTICLE TOPICS

NORTH AMERICA36097
MAINLAND CHINA35607
USA36116
TRADE DISPUTE76304
GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN92935
POLICIES & REGULATIONS72580

Social Share

FOLLOW US

GET WEEKLY UPDATES

newpaper-img

GET OUR WEEKLY EMAIL UPDATES

banner-img


I acknowledge that the above information may be used by the Hong Kong Trade Development Council (HKTDC) for incorporation in all or any of its database for direct marketing or business matching purpose (and may therefore become available to the public within and/or outside of Hong Kong for use by them), and for any other purposes as stated in the Privacy Policy Statement; I confirm that I have the consent and the authority of each individual named in this form to release their personal data for the purposes stated herein.


*For non-EU/EEA customers, please skip this box which is solely for EU/EEA customers as required by the relevant data protection law in the EU.

THANK YOU

Thank you for registering.

interest_article

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

17 February 2021

Downstream Products Included in XUAR Import Detention Order

22 January 2021

OFAC Issues Hong Kong-Related Sanctions Regulations, Names Entities to Sanctions List

11 January 2021

U.S. Targets Eight Additional Mainland Chinese Apps

22 December 2020

Defence Authorisation Bill Contains Provisions of Potential Interest to Hong Kong and Mainland China

Related Events

RELATED EVENTS

10 - 12 March 2021

Fashion HK at China International Fashion Fair, Shanghai, CHIC 2021 (Spring)

10 - 12 March 2021

The 56th China International Beauty Expo (Guangzhou) Spring

10 - 12 March 2021

Intertextile Shanghai Apparel Fabrics, Spring Edition

12 - 14 May 2021

Hong Kong Pavilion at the 26th China Beauty Expo, Shanghai
FIND AN EVENT

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

Footer Menu

  • hktdc.com
  • ABOUT HKTDC
  • MEDIA ROOM
  • TERMS OF USE
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • SITEMAP
  • 京ICP备09059244号

Footer Logo

Copyrights

Copyright © 2021 Hong Kong Trade Development Council. All rights reserved.

SHARE THIS STORY

EMAIL
LINKEDIN
WeChat
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
WHATSAPP

ID: HKTDCofficial

Don't have an account?

Create An Account

successfully added on your preferences.