HKTDC Hong Kong Means Business

Hong Kong Means Business Hong Kong Means Business

Search form

Languages

  • EN
  • 繁
  • 简
SUBSCRIBE
  • EVENTS
  • MY FEED
  • CONTACT HKTDC
  • ABOUT HKTDC
  • hktdc.com

Section Menu

  • multimedia
  • market spotlight
  • first person
  • Venture Hong Kong
  • heads-up
  • inside china
  • life & style
  • hktdc research

Search form

Languages

  • EN
  • 繁
  • 简
SUBSCRIBE
Hong Kong Means Business

Section Menu

  • multimedia
  • market spotlight
  • first person
  • Venture Hong Kong
  • heads-up
  • inside china
  • life & style
  • hktdc research

https://hkmb.hktdc.com/en/NTQ0NDIzNjIy

hktdc research
SAVE FOR LATER
SHARE / SEND

"Scan QR Code" in WeChat and tap "..." to share.

MEPs Threaten to Veto Potential Brexit Trade Deal and Commission Threatens to Walk Away from Trade Talks

22 September 2020



Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) have warned that they would veto any trade deal with the UK, unless the UK government withdraws its plans to breach key parts of the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement via its Internal Market Bill. The European Commission has also threatened to withdraw from its talks with the UK on a potential trade deal unless the UK government withdraws the bill. The President of the European Council, Charles Michel, joined other senior political figures within the EU in warning that the UK’s international credibility was at stake and that the UK must fulfil its responsibility to implement the Withdrawal Agreement. However, despite these warnings, on 14 September, the Internal Market Bill cleared its first hurdle in the UK’s House of Commons, with UK MPs voting to back the bill. Hong Kong companies should be aware that this row between the EU and the UK may significantly increase the chances of there being no agreement on a post-Brexit trade deal between the EU and the UK.

As reported previously in Regulatory Alert–EU Issue No. 358/2020: UK Government Creates Uproar at Home and in Brussels Over Proposed Changes to Withdrawal Agreement, the UK government’s Internal Market Bill, which is designed to govern trade within the UK following the end of the transition period on 31 December 2020, ensures that there will be no new checks on goods moving from Northern Ireland to the rest of Great Britain (England, Scotland and Wales). It also gives the UK powers to modify or “disapply” rules relating to the movement of goods that will come into force on 1 January 2021, if a trade agreement between the UK and EU is not achieved. However, these provisions breach the “Northern Ireland Protocol” which was negotiated by the UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson last October as part of the Withdrawal Agreement. Also known simply as the Irish Protocol, it requires the UK to keep to the EU’s customs code in Northern Ireland to ensure that there is no return to a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.

The UK government has said that the bill is essential to enable goods and services to flow freely across Great Britain and Northern Ireland when the UK leaves the EU's single market and customs union. Boris Johnson has claimed that the ability to modify or disapply parts of the Withdrawal Agreement is a failsafe mechanism in case the EU interprets the agreement, in particular the Irish Protocol, in an “extreme and unreasonable” way, which could lead to excessive checks and even tariffs on goods moving from Great Britain to Northern Ireland.

In a statement, the leaders of the European Parliament’s main political groups said that if the UK government breaches or threatens to breach the Withdrawal Agreement through the Internal Market Bill, or in any other way, “the European Parliament will, under no circumstances ratify any agreement between the EU and the UK.” The statement went on to say that MEPs were “disappointed with the continued lack of reciprocal engagement from the UK side on fundamental EU principles and interests.” The European Parliament is required to give its approval for a trade agreement to be ratified, even though the European Commission leads the negotiations.

This statement from MEPs comes as the European Commission demanded on 11 September that the UK government must “withdraw these measures from the draft Bill in the shortest time possible and in any case by the end of the month.” This statement from the European Commission followed an emergency meeting between European Commission Vice President Maroš Šefčovič and UK Minister for the Cabinet Office Michael Gove, where Šefčovič said that if the bill were adopted it would constitute an “extremely serious violation” of the Withdrawal Agreement and international law. The European Commission also said that “by putting forward this Bill, the UK has seriously damaged trust between the EU and the UK. It is now up to the UK government to re-establish that trust.” The European Commission added that it would not shy away from taking legal action against the UK.

However, Michael Gove said that in the meeting with Šefčovič, he had “made it perfectly clear that we would not be withdrawing this legislation.”

Despite the strong negative reaction from Brussels as well as the threats of MEPs and the European Commission to put an end to the potential Brexit trade deal, the UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has pressed ahead with the Internal Market Bill. On 14 September, the bill passed its first reading in the UK Parliament’s House of Commons by a majority of 70 votes, despite a number of MPs from the party of the government, the Conservative Party, voting against the bill. Although it is worth noting that on 17 September, Boris Johnson – in a move designed to appease dissenting Conservative MPs – agreed to amend the bill slightly, giving MPs the right to vote again before he could use the powers in the bill that would override parts of the Withdrawal Agreement.

The bill will now be subjected to further scrutiny by the House of Commons, and thereafter by the UK Parliament’s House of Lords. It may well be delayed in the latter, given the lack of a government majority in the House of Lords and the House of Lords’ ability to delay the passing of bills into law by a maximum of one year.

Commentators contend that Prime Minister Boris Johnson believed that the Internal Market Bill would help to push the European Commission’s negotiating team to offer concessions on State aid and fisheries, the main areas of disagreement that are holding up an EU-UK trade deal. However, the reaction of the European Commission, the European Parliament and EU leaders suggests that this tactic may have backfired. Indeed, the row over the bill has disrupted the eighth round of trade talks and both sides agreed that little progress had been made.

Boris Johnson had previously said that if a trade deal is not reached by 15 October, both sides should “move on”. Hong Kong traders should note that this row over the Internal Market Bill has significantly increased the chances of no agreement on a trade deal. The result of this “no deal” scenario would be EU-UK trade being conducted on World Trade Organization terms from 1 January 2021 onwards and higher tariffs and quotas on a wide range of goods and services.

BACK TO TOP ^
    Topics:
  • EU,
  • Western Europe,
  • United Kingdom,
  • Brexit,
  • policies & regulations
  • EU
  • Western Europe
  • United Kingdom
  • EU
  • Western Europe
  • United Kingdom
  • EU
  • Western Europe
  • United Kingdom
  • EU
  • Western Europe
  • United Kingdom
  • EU
  • Western Europe
  • United Kingdom
  • EU
  • Western Europe
  • United Kingdom
  • EU
  • Western Europe
  • United Kingdom
  • EU
  • Western Europe
  • United Kingdom
Home

Article Topics

ARTICLE TOPICS

EU37804
WESTERN EUROPE36222
UNITED KINGDOM36245
BREXIT117941
POLICIES & REGULATIONS72580

ARTICLE TOPICS

EU37804
WESTERN EUROPE36222
UNITED KINGDOM36245
BREXIT117941
POLICIES & REGULATIONS72580

Social Share

FOLLOW US

GET WEEKLY UPDATES

newpaper-img

GET OUR WEEKLY EMAIL UPDATES

banner-img


I acknowledge that the above information may be used by the Hong Kong Trade Development Council (HKTDC) for incorporation in all or any of its database for direct marketing or business matching purpose (and may therefore become available to the public within and/or outside of Hong Kong for use by them), and for any other purposes as stated in the Privacy Policy Statement; I confirm that I have the consent and the authority of each individual named in this form to release their personal data for the purposes stated herein.


*For non-EU/EEA customers, please skip this box which is solely for EU/EEA customers as required by the relevant data protection law in the EU.

THANK YOU

Thank you for registering.

interest_article

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

11 December 2020

Post-Brexit: EU and UK Agree on Certain Provisions Concerning Northern Ireland

03 December 2020

The UK’s Latest Trade Agreements and Ongoing Trade Negotiations with Third Countries

14 October 2020

Turkey’s Accession to EU Seen As Very Unlikely; Other Countries’ Status Also Assessed

05 October 2020

European Commission Triggers Infringement Procedure Against UK for Failure to Withdraw Controversial Bill

Related Events

RELATED EVENTS

22 - 26 January 2021

HK Atelier at Maison et Objet, Paris, France (cancelled)

22 February 2021

HKTDC Research Seminar “The UK’s Post-Brexit E-Commerce Market” (Webinar)

1 - 4 June 2021

Interzoo 2021, Nuremberg, Germany

20 - 24 July 2021

Spielwarenmesse Nuremberg, Germany
FIND AN EVENT

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

Footer Menu

  • hktdc.com
  • ABOUT HKTDC
  • MEDIA ROOM
  • TERMS OF USE
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • SITEMAP
  • 京ICP备09059244号

Footer Logo

Copyrights

Copyright © 2021 Hong Kong Trade Development Council. All rights reserved.

SHARE THIS STORY

EMAIL
LINKEDIN
WeChat
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
WHATSAPP

ID: HKTDCofficial

Don't have an account?

Create An Account

successfully added on your preferences.